400咨询电话:400-657-8638 中文版
Popular choice
Prices
Order Now
blog
our service
Essays
Term Papers
Thesis Papers
Dissertations
Customer service center
 New Customers
 ·Ask for a Quote
 Existing Customers
 ·Contact Support/Writer
 ·View/Track my orders
 ·Assignment Download
财务中心
汇款确认
国内汇款方式
国外汇款方式
 CAntaCt us
免费热线:400-657-8638

国内电话:010-51281033
010-51281044

国际电话:1-847-849-9784

电子邮件:hotlw@vip.163.com


在线客服

QQ:981339 点击这里给我发消息

 Our advantAgeS
387 professional writers
100% plagiarism FREE
FREE works-cited page
Fully referenced
Any citation style
275/550 Words Per Page
Free Revisions
Was Hamlet Insane?

Hamlet a hardy man, courageous, and worthy of eternal commendation, who arming himself with a crafty, dissembling, and strange show of being distract out of his mind, under that pretense deceived the wise, and crafty, thereby not only preserving his life from the reasons and wicked practices of the tyrant, but by an new and unexpected kind of punishment revenged his fathers death many years after the act committed I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a hand saw (II.ii.376-7). This is a classic example of the wild and whirling worlds (I.v.134) with which Hamlet hopes to persuade people to believe that he is mad. These words, however, prove that beneath his antic disposition, Hamlet is very sane. indeed. Beneath a strange choice of imagery involving points of the compass, the weather, and hunting birds, he is announcing that he is calculatedly choosing the times when you appear mad. Hamlets madness was faked I think for a purpose. He warned his friends he intended to fake madness, but Gertrude as well as Claudius saw through it, and even the slightly dull-witted Polonius was suspicious. His public face is one of insanity but, in his private moments of soliloquy, through his confidences to Horatio, and in his careful plans of action, we see that his madness is assumed. After Hamlet has discovered the truth about his father, he goes through a very traumatic period, which is interpreted as madness by readers and characters. With the death of his father and the hasty, incestuous remarriage of his mother to his uncle, Hamlet is thrown into a suicidal frame of mind in which the uses of this world seem to him ;weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable. Many ironies and misunderstands of the play cannot be understood without a proper awareness of this gap between Hamlets knowledge and the most others ignorance of the murder. For, according to their own lights, Polonius and the rest behave as normally as they should be, obeying and flattering a king whom they acknowledge as their great ruler. Hamlet, for his part, is so obsessed with the secret murder that he overreacts to those around him, rejecting overtures of friendship and becoming embittered, callous, brutal, and even violent. His antisocial behavior gives the others good reason to fear him as a menace to the state. Nevertheless, we share with Hamlet a knowledge of the truth, and know that he is right whereas the others are at best unhappily deceived by their own blind complicity in evil. No man was in his right state of contemplates suicide and would take his life due to human frailty. Either his love for Ophelia was never strong as he said, which in doubt, or he has really gone insane by assuming every situation is going to happen and he sacrifices her love for revenge. Throughout the play, there are also supporting factors to argue Hamlets sanity, as these details compromise his madness, and that if Horatio notices any strange behavior from Hamlet, it is because he is putting on an act. [Act I, scene V, lines 166-180]. He knows that he is not the same as he used to be and fears he is going insane, so by telling his closes friend that he is just an act, he covers his tracks. It is no, nor it cannot come to good...but break my heart, for must hold my tongue. All he can do in this frustrated state is to lash out with bitter satire at the evils he sees and then relapse into suicidal melancholy. Hamlet has mood swings as his mood changes badly throughout the play. Hamlet appears to be insane, after Poloniuss death, in act IV scene II. In conclusion, Hamlet was a genius. In his mind were thoughts and plans in which he always knew each persons next step before they did it. Due to his procrastination and thoughts of revenge he became so overwhelmed with every situation and plot that he entangled himself in his own schemes and had to sacrifice his sanity. Only then did he truly become insane and couldnt control the web that he was weaving. Even if the madness was true or false, as Hamlet portrayed the role of a madman he took it upon himself to be lost in his control of actions. Two recent writers, Mr. J.M. Robertson and Professor Stoll of the University of Minnesota, have issued small books which can be praised for moving in the other direction of Hamlets attitude. Mr. Robertson points out, very closely how critics have failed to there interruption of Hamlet by ignoring what out to be very obvious: that Hamlet is a stratification, that it represents the efforts of series of men, each making what he could out of the work of his predecessors. Also Mr. J.M. Robertson states that I do not believe Hamlet was insane, but merely pretending. Mr. Robertson clearly states that Hamlet was insane. Other critics do not believe this fact though. Professor Stoll from the University of Minnesota, believes that Hamlet was insane. For me this is very rare. This is the first critic that I have read that thinks that Hamlet was not insane. Professor Stoll says Hamlet was truly insane. He spoke to himself when he was alone, he had strange mood swings, he hated his mother, and always talked about death. Professor Stoll does have a point, but Hamlets real reasons for these acting were to get revenge for his fathers death, and in order to get his thoughts together about his revenge on the killer he had to put on an act and not be himself. Some writers are even known for saying that Shakespeare was insane, and he was using Hamlet as his impersonator. I find this fact somewhat true. In half of Shakespeares tragedies someone has either went insane or was already insane. Othello, The Moor Of Venice he went insane when he found out that his wife was cheating on him, which was not true. Romeo and Juliet, Romeo went insane over his love for Juliet. In Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. I can not say whether he was insane or sane. myself I say that he was sane, but from his actions throughout the play it makes it seem as if he was insane. And also in Macbeth and in Julius Caesar. Five out of ten William Shakespeares tragedies contains insanity either one of his characters are insane or is becoming insane. Word Count: 1089  
Acceptance Essays
American History
Animal Science
Anthropology
Art
Astronomy
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
English Essays
Environment
Environmental Issues
Ethics
European History
Films & Cinema
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Government & Politics
Health & Beauty
History
History World
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Movies & Cinema
Movies & Tv
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Issues
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Speech & Communication
Sports & Games
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Thesis & Dissertations
英语教学论文
英语毕业论文
高中英语论文
小学英语
初中英语
英语教育
商务英语
英语语言学
计算机英语
英美文学
英语翻译
学术英语
跨文化交流
听力口语